|
Summary Capsule
Mutant Meter
Movie Store [proceeds go toward monthly MRFH upkeep]
It doesn't help that every few minutes it takes the time to bash you over the head screaming "IRONY! LOOK! IRONY!" It's not a total loss, some jokes stick,Bale can deliver a line, and the movie sure does look and sound like the evil yuppie 80's. But it is hollow, an empty space where a movie should be.
Patrick Bateman (Christian Bale) is this rich jerk whose life is centered around the material world (alas, without Madonna), and it just leaves him cold. Instead of taking up a fulfilling hobby like basketweaving or perhaps attending church once in a while to wash his black soul clean, he begins to murder for fun and... well, fun. This brings us to the second and third crappy items on the list of why not to see this flick: all the murders (while graphic in concept) are held back on screen with camera tricks (pan away, shadows, just letting us see the aftermath), lessening their shock value, and as a killer, Patrick is nothing more than a shell. We, well most of us, aren't supportive of serial killers. But if we have to watch films about them, they'd better be interesting instead of Masters of Brooding and Introspection. He's a cold, dead fish, and I couldn't care less about his motives or feelings. In many ways, Patrick Bateman is a spoiled little kid, whining to the world that he's put upon. What the movie needed was for a grandmother to come up and slap some sense into him. Bad Patrick! Killing bad! There is an incredible bounty of celeb cameos, but you feel sorry for their illiteracy; obviously, if they'd been able to read scripts, they would not have shown up in a bomb like this. [Semi-spoiler ahead] As if all this monotonous mood and dreary killings weren't bad enough, we have to suffer through another one of Hollywood's patent "trick endings that make no sense, and ruin any effort on the film's behalf to be serious". The last fifteen minutes of American Psycho get downright goofy, as if the scriptwriter let his six-year-old son fill in the blanks with a burnt umber crayon. Whether it makes sense or not, I don't care, but what it does do is negate the entire film. So not only did we go through a brutal and vicious film, we did so for no reason whatsoever. When I look at it, the only reason I can see for this film's existence is that they were aiming hard to get critical praise for style and subtext. Because I don't see any audience liking this movie, and in fact, it all but makes you hate it. Where's Norman Bates when you need a likable killer these days?
I'm gonna go ahead here and suggest that this may have been a HORRIBLY BAD MISTAKE. I so wanted this to be a great film. In fact, I thought it was for a long time. Saw it at the cinema, thought 'Good job bringing the book to the screen'. Then, my friends, I talked to people who hadn't read the book. "It was rubbish.", they said, "It was just Christian Bale killing a bunch of people in, admittedly, amusing ways, with an ending that doesn't make sense." This caused much brow furrowing on my part - I'd gone into the cinema knowing the 'truth' behind the film - but surely somewhere in there the screenplay writer had included the necessary exposition to point out what's made pretty clear in the book, enforcing the important and deep message of the film? A re-watch told me that my optimism in the screenwriting was as misplaced as my faith in the Sci-Fi Channel to let any half-decent TV show run without being cancelled. They'd fluffed it, screwed the pooch, locked the barn door after the horse had bolted after putting all their eggs in the same basket. Oh, and they'd also turned a book with at least an interesting premise and a message about escapism into a film about Christian Bale killing a bunch of people in admittedly amusing ways. Dumbasses. If Brett Easton Ellis were dead, he'd be rolling in his grave. So below, here is the missing section of American Psycho. Be warned, below are SPOILERS for the book, so if you do not wish to know the result, look away now. They all gone? Right here goes. The keystone to understanding the film, and the message behind it. Patrick Bateman is not a serial killer. In fact, he doesn't ever kill anyone in the entire film. And before you all come charging in with your comments like 'But didn't he drop that chainsaw through that one girl's torso?', yes, you're right, on film we see Bateman bumping off cast left and right, before our very eyes. However, what we are meant to realize by the end of the film are that these are just Bateman's fantasies -- he hates his lifestyle and everything attached to it, yet can't bear to be considered an outcast. The only way he can distance himself from the people he abhors is in his mind. Kind of a big concept for them not to spell out, huh? In fact, if you watch the film, there are the most subtle of visual clues in this regard (all of Patrick's fantasy execution sequences begin in the film with him withdrawing money from an ATM, for instance) - but they're clues you'd only pick up if you actually knew what you were looking for in the first place. How they managed to drop the ball so magnificently on this leaves a horribly furrowed wrinkle on my otherwise smooth and lustrous forehead. Did the screenwriters think that the concept of Patrick's delusion would leak into the audience via osmosis? Or perhaps it is in there after all, but encoded so subtly that only 0.13% of the population will notice them? Just thinking about it makes my brain hurt like I've just eaten a 4 tubs of ice cream. Oooo, brain freeze. Honestly, if you hated this film when you watched it the first time, think about going back to it armed with the knowledge that Patrick is delusional and depressed, rather than unemotional and psychotic. Moments like Patrick's chance for redemption with his secretary Jean, his interviews with Detective Kimbal, and most importantly the end, will make a bunch more sense, and might actually increase your enjoyment of the film. So that’s it, rant over. I feel vented now, I no longer have to delusionaly imagine myself hunting down the screenwriters and hurting them in creative ways with my office stapler and a magnetic fishing game. Instead I urge you to overlook the glaring omissions in the film, and perhaps re-appreciate it for something other than a wannabe-stylish slash thriller. Oh, and the Pocket Review: Christian Bale kills a lot of people in admittedly amusing ways. The ending doesn't make sense. What else you take from this film, I leave up to you.
Is It Worth Staying Through End Credits?
Intermission! [some sources: IMDb]
Stars Christian Bale and Willem Dafoe have both played Jesus in previous films: Bale in Mary, Mother of Jesus and Dafoe in Last Temptation of Christ. In The English Patient, Dafoe played opposite Jurgen Prochnow, who played Jesus in Seventh Sign. Groovy Quotes
Bateman: That's a very expensive glass of Chardonnay you're NOT drinking there. It isn't poisoned. Bateman: Harold, you're my lawyer, so I think you should know... I've killed quite a few people. Bateman: I like to dissect women. Did you know I'm utterly insane? Bateman: My need to engage in homicidal behavior on a massive scale cannot be corrected, but, ah, I have no other way to fulfil my needs.
Waiter: Would you like to hear today's specials?
Bateman: I have all the characteristics of a human being: blood, flesh, skin, hair; but not a single, clear, identifiable emotion, except for greed and disgust. Something horrible is happening inside of me and I don't know why. My nightly bloodlust has overflown into my days. I feel lethal, on the verge of frenzy. I think my mask of sanity is about to slip.
Bateman: Do you know what Ed Gein said about women? "When I see a pretty girl walking down the street, I think two things. One part wants me to be real nice and sweet and treat her right."
ATM Machine: Feed me a stray cat. If you liked this movie, try these: This review page was last updated on 5.29.04 MRFH Home . Reviews . Findaflik . Features! . MRFH Forum © 2004 Mutant Reviewers From Hell (Original Content). All Rights Reserved. |