<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Justin does Quantum of Solace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mutantreviewers.com/blog1/index.php/justin-does-quantum-of-solace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mutantreviewers.com/blog1/justin-does-quantum-of-solace/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:59:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: britomart</title>
		<link>http://mutantreviewers.com/blog1/justin-does-quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-4214</link>
		<dc:creator>britomart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mutantreviewers.com/blog1/?p=2776#comment-4214</guid>
		<description>Ohh! I liked QoS much better than Casino Royale. Remember the xkcd strip about wanting a perfect 90-minute action scene? It was like that, but I actually enjoyed it. Casino Royale was very long, very dark, and completely incomprehensible (OK...well, I watched it while terribly ill, but still) but QoS was tight, light, and loads of fun. Maybe it&#039;s just that I don&#039;t expect much from my Bond movies...

And I thought the first two Bourne movies had plenty of soul (though I&#039;ll give you the third one - a real disappointment).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohh! I liked QoS much better than Casino Royale. Remember the xkcd strip about wanting a perfect 90-minute action scene? It was like that, but I actually enjoyed it. Casino Royale was very long, very dark, and completely incomprehensible (OK&#8230;well, I watched it while terribly ill, but still) but QoS was tight, light, and loads of fun. Maybe it&#8217;s just that I don&#8217;t expect much from my Bond movies&#8230;</p>
<p>And I thought the first two Bourne movies had plenty of soul (though I&#8217;ll give you the third one &#8211; a real disappointment).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://mutantreviewers.com/blog1/justin-does-quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-3938</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mutantreviewers.com/blog1/?p=2776#comment-3938</guid>
		<description>You should read the books, selena- it&#039;s almost the opposite.  Mr. &quot;Cain is for Charlie, and Delta is for Cain&quot; Bourne is practically a robot for most of the first book, at least, while Bond has a fair amount of emotional depth.  Like in &quot;The Living Daylights,&quot; where he disobeyed orders and only shot that Soviet sniper in the hand because he was depressed and felt bad for her.

(Mind you, I thought Bond displayed quite a bit of emotion and inner turmoil in Royale, albeit veiled just beneath the surface.)

The best analysis of Bond I ever read, focusing on Casino Royale (courtesy of Dave&#039;s Long Box), runs like this:

&quot;Fleming’s James Bond is more conflicted and prone to self-doubt than his superhuman cinema counterpart. He’s a Cold War civil servant who has developed expensive tastes and bad habits, a hollow killer who immerses himself in sensual pleasures to distract himself from his inevitable violent fate. He drinks way too much, smokes too much, eats unhealthy gourmet cuisine, and pops the occasional pill to kill the pain or perk himself up. James Bond is not going to grow old, he’s going to die with a 9mm bullet in his lung or a knife between his ribs and he knows it.  [...]  Above all, Fleming’s books are about James Bond, the character.

This brings us to Casino Royale and how much it kicked ass.

Have you seen this movie? I don’t know if I’ve just been starving for a proper Bond film and it has skewed my critical faculties, but holy crap, I loved it. From beginning to end, Casino Royale was Bondian.

Daniel Craig captures the manly essence of a James Bond at the beginning of his career. He’s a callous, over-confident killer with a bit of an attitude who has developed some unhealthy coping skills to deal with the realities of his work. Unlike some previous Bonds, you really feel like this guy could die, that at some point he will die. He’s not ridiculously competent at everything he does, just most things. And he can run hella fast. We’re talking Robert Patrick-fast.

The thing I liked most about Casino Royale was that it treated James Bond as a character. He doesn&#039;t just float through the movie, untouchable. Bond has an emotional investment in the events of the movie and has a definite character arc – he has changed from the beginning of the film to the end. He sincerely, deeply falls in love with Vesper (Eva Green) despite the raccoon eye make-up she wears all the time that makes her look like Darryl Hannah in Blade Runner.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should read the books, selena- it&#8217;s almost the opposite.  Mr. &#8220;Cain is for Charlie, and Delta is for Cain&#8221; Bourne is practically a robot for most of the first book, at least, while Bond has a fair amount of emotional depth.  Like in &#8220;The Living Daylights,&#8221; where he disobeyed orders and only shot that Soviet sniper in the hand because he was depressed and felt bad for her.</p>
<p>(Mind you, I thought Bond displayed quite a bit of emotion and inner turmoil in Royale, albeit veiled just beneath the surface.)</p>
<p>The best analysis of Bond I ever read, focusing on Casino Royale (courtesy of Dave&#8217;s Long Box), runs like this:</p>
<p>&#8220;Fleming’s James Bond is more conflicted and prone to self-doubt than his superhuman cinema counterpart. He’s a Cold War civil servant who has developed expensive tastes and bad habits, a hollow killer who immerses himself in sensual pleasures to distract himself from his inevitable violent fate. He drinks way too much, smokes too much, eats unhealthy gourmet cuisine, and pops the occasional pill to kill the pain or perk himself up. James Bond is not going to grow old, he’s going to die with a 9mm bullet in his lung or a knife between his ribs and he knows it.  [...]  Above all, Fleming’s books are about James Bond, the character.</p>
<p>This brings us to Casino Royale and how much it kicked ass.</p>
<p>Have you seen this movie? I don’t know if I’ve just been starving for a proper Bond film and it has skewed my critical faculties, but holy crap, I loved it. From beginning to end, Casino Royale was Bondian.</p>
<p>Daniel Craig captures the manly essence of a James Bond at the beginning of his career. He’s a callous, over-confident killer with a bit of an attitude who has developed some unhealthy coping skills to deal with the realities of his work. Unlike some previous Bonds, you really feel like this guy could die, that at some point he will die. He’s not ridiculously competent at everything he does, just most things. And he can run hella fast. We’re talking Robert Patrick-fast.</p>
<p>The thing I liked most about Casino Royale was that it treated James Bond as a character. He doesn&#8217;t just float through the movie, untouchable. Bond has an emotional investment in the events of the movie and has a definite character arc – he has changed from the beginning of the film to the end. He sincerely, deeply falls in love with Vesper (Eva Green) despite the raccoon eye make-up she wears all the time that makes her look like Darryl Hannah in Blade Runner.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selena</title>
		<link>http://mutantreviewers.com/blog1/justin-does-quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-3936</link>
		<dc:creator>selena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mutantreviewers.com/blog1/?p=2776#comment-3936</guid>
		<description>bourne at least has feelings, something bond never really seems to have. both bourne and bond have seeken revenge for the killing of the girl they loved. but with bourne i believed it and with bond i don&#039;t. even in this reboot bond still has all the emotional depht of a robot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bourne at least has feelings, something bond never really seems to have. both bourne and bond have seeken revenge for the killing of the girl they loved. but with bourne i believed it and with bond i don&#8217;t. even in this reboot bond still has all the emotional depht of a robot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sitting Duck</title>
		<link>http://mutantreviewers.com/blog1/justin-does-quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-3931</link>
		<dc:creator>Sitting Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mutantreviewers.com/blog1/?p=2776#comment-3931</guid>
		<description>Tiny gun? Boy, the innuendo you could squeeze out of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tiny gun? Boy, the innuendo you could squeeze out of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
